These folks are
generally very thoughtful and very aware of assorted “-isms.” Some of them are,
like me, well past the age that many— including movie theaters, sociologists,
and service providers—would consider old (or ‘older,’ ‘aging,’ ‘elderly,’ ‘senior’
… pick your euphemism). Yet the word “old” applied to a peer instead of to an
amorphous population seems uncomfortable for them. They’re quick to dismiss my
claim to being old, as if agreeing would somehow be insulting to me. This sort
of response implies—if subtly—that being old is a bad thing, a characteristic
you would never attribute to a friend, one you’d deny if it were applied to you.
These reactions reminded me how prickly the labels we apply can be, especially those that have a long history of negative associations. Using such labels implies a negative judgment. They’re insulting, so denying that they’re true is considered kind, even flattering.
These reactions reminded me how prickly the labels we apply can be, especially those that have a long history of negative associations. Using such labels implies a negative judgment. They’re insulting, so denying that they’re true is considered kind, even flattering.
Thinking later
about these conversations, I was wishing I had framed my response differently.
I wish I had shifted the conversation to one about calling people “young.” We
apply that description to people across a very wide age range. We can call a
5-year-old a “young woman” or “young man.” We call the last-born child in a
family the “young” one regardless of their age. We talk about people in their
20s, 30s, even 40s as young women/men or young people. And we complement adults
of any age—but especially “older” ones—by telling them how young they look, how
youthful they seem, how they don’t look their age, how they seem so much younger. We don’t have an
age criterion for referring to someone as “young”—like the one my friend had
for deeming someone legitimately “old” (83 is old, 68 is not).
Since “young” is good, we can apply it to anyone without fear of offending them. So, unless “old” is a bad thing, why wouldn’t we be equally comfortable using it as a descriptor? Resisting the label “old” (for myself or for someone else) seems to me to be a clue that the word “old” carries a negative meaning. Maybe that conversation would have made my point more clearly. Maybe that would help us begin to reframe what the word “old” means, resist the assumption that our age is a detriment instead of a marvelous gift.
Since “young” is good, we can apply it to anyone without fear of offending them. So, unless “old” is a bad thing, why wouldn’t we be equally comfortable using it as a descriptor? Resisting the label “old” (for myself or for someone else) seems to me to be a clue that the word “old” carries a negative meaning. Maybe that conversation would have made my point more clearly. Maybe that would help us begin to reframe what the word “old” means, resist the assumption that our age is a detriment instead of a marvelous gift.
So who, I ask you, can change all this better
than us old folks? I think we have to take the lead, just as other groups have
taken the lead in naming themselves. If we can’t interrupt these associations—insist
that old is a genuinely fine way to
be—then we’ll always have to disguise our age, wish it away, resist claiming
it, be grateful when people assure us that it’s just not true of us. More
importantly, we’ll have to accept the cultural assumption that we’re only
worthwhile if we’re not old.
Not that I don’t
have my moments. I sometimes find myself uncomfortable about my age. For
instance, I recently went to a conference that included a lot of young
participants and presenters. Afterward, I was filling out an evaluation form,
and they asked for age. I hesitated. I considered not sending it in. I even
considered lying on the age question. As if my age meant my opinion wouldn’t be
worthwhile. Now, it’s true that my responses might not be taken seriously
because of my age—that would be ageist on the part of the folks reading the
questionnaire. But my hesitation, my doubt was my stuff, not theirs.
This whole
acknowledging, welcoming, celebrating oldness remains a work in progress. Staying with it will require finding ways to have
thoughtful, even difficult conversations with people who are uncomfortable with
the topic and eager to erase oldness. Personally, I’ll keep on trying to find a
good way to do that. Because I’ve lived a long, full life, and I’m actually not flattered when people dismiss that
time as if it were meaningless.
This one really struck home for me. A friend recently shared a birthday card her daughter had made for her, which reassured, "48 isn't old, Mom. You're not old til you're 55". As a 55 year old, I noticed a visceral reaction to this, which demonstrates exactly your point: as a culture, we have been inculcated with the belief, "Young is good; old is bad". I have a lot of younger (than me) friends, who I sometimes want to school about history: my history, LGBTQ history, the world as it used to be before smartphones. I have friends, older (than me), whose stories I want to hear and know. In all the seemingly sudden awareness of Q teen suicide, I found myself wanting to remind everyone about the suffering and courage and survival of our elders. So, yes, I am with you. Let's start a celebratory campaign to honor all parts of the age continuum. We are all on it somewhere, and we can and should celebrate every part of it!
ReplyDelete