Dickens and the waterfall

(If you received this blog by email, you might want to visit the actual site. The pictures work much better there. 

Just click on the title “Dickens and the waterfall”)

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,

it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness,

it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity,

it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness,

it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair,

we had everything before us, we had nothing before us …

- Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities (1859)

Here it is, amazingly, the end of another year. It’s been a remarkable one in so many ways. Dickens pretty much nailed it. It’s all so disorienting, I thought a bit of reflection on what the year actually held might help make sense of it. It’ll also serve as a catch-up of sorts, since I was incommunicado here for most of the year.

And, as so often happens, I figured out what I wanted to say as I wrote. Hence the odd allusion to the waterfall in the title.

So,  for starters, I promised to comment on my bloggish silence from January to November. The short explanation is that I had “blogger’s block.” But that’s a cop-out, a description that explains nothing. So let me try again. At some point, I noticed that instead of enjoying writing, I was feeling obligated to do it, and then I got anxious when I didn’t. The best defense against anxiety is avoidance (think elevator phobia), so that’s what I did. But why the lack of enjoyment, when I’ve always loved writing? And why the sense of obligation to do a totally voluntary activity? The second is easier: I know it’s good for me to have an outlet for my ponderings, and some folks appreciate it, so of course I should do it. The first is harder: why the resistance? Complicated. Partly just too busy. Partly, some experiences that left me feeling tentative about writing. Partly a growing discomfort with the “selfie /facebook culture” and the assumption that everyone (anyone) would want to hear about what I was doing or thinking. Seemed pretty self-centered to me … heck, writing about myself and my life is self-centered, by definition.

So, although people encouraged me to return to this space, I stayed away. Until November 8. At that point, I so needed an outlet for my feelings and thoughts—and connections to a wider community—that all the rest seemed unimportant. That elevator stuff is still there, in the background. But it just doesn’t matter in the same way. I need to be here, and if others appreciate it, that’s a bonus.

So, a few glimpses of what I would have written about in 2016, if I’d been writing.

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times

You may recall that 2015 was the year of my return to fitness program, culminating in a hike in Southern Utah (specifically, Capitol Reef) that had been my aspirational aim through my self-rehab process. I had a wonderful hike, although I didn’t find the arch I was aiming for. I loved the day … and in the back of my mind, I wanted to go back and try again.

It was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness

This past spring, feeling my oats after a full year of orthopedic health, I decided to visit Utah again, this time to hike a favorite trail in the Needles District of Canyonlands. En route, I stopped to take a shortish hike in a small canyon I remember from my desert rat days. It was a very hot day, but I’ve always loved the dessert heat, so I figured I’d “warm up” for the next 

day’s planned long hike by doing this short one. Right at lunchtime. Perfect for a picnic beneath the arch at the canyon’s end.  

Unfortunately, I hadn’t reckoned with what about 15 years’ added age would do to my tolerance for mid-day 103° direct sunshine. I struggled out of the canyon with a mild case of heat exhaustion, sadly certain that I couldn’t recover enough for the next day’s long (equally hot) walk in Canyonlands.  So I postponed that hike until next year … and congratulated myself on my wisdom.

And I was back to the best of times …

I had a glorious summer, resurrecting my long-dormant passion for hiking in the mountains. I hooked up with a couple of friends who are also avid hikers, and together we visited old favorites and explored new (to me, at least) hikes along streams, to glacial lakes, among early summer flowers and fall colors, with moose families posing for pictures just before tiny snowflakes spotted our jackets. This return to the woods was wonderful for me. I’d forgotten how much I love it.

          

     

                

                                                             

The year held lots of indoor adventures, too. Plays, concerts, educational events—talks, panels, documentaries, a CU on the Weekend course—any of which would have been blog-worthy. And my mega-cultural undertaking: working with Resonance Women’s Chorus through the spring  concert and the early summer (the national conference of LGBTQ choruses, GALA, was here) and then again through the fall. Stories, stories, all untold. And then there’s OutSources, the weekly LGBTQ-themed radio show that a group of us produce. Over the year, I did a dozen or so shows, most with my partner—we pretty much work as a DJ duo these days—on topics ranging from religious freedom restoration acts through trans misogyny and Orlando to non-binary identities and AIDS work in South Africa—lots of these also warranted blogs.

 

We traveled to a few conferences, and added in playful travels, like a trip to DC with my partner’s 14-year-old grandson. Predictably, his favorite parts were the Air and Space Museum and crabbing with his great uncle. Some pictures, but no blog. Then there were the un-travels: a couple of “staycations” at a hotel, featuring sleep-ins, coffee and newspaper while lounging in the room, and lots of movies. Blog material galore.

To finish off the summer, my partner joined me on a trip back to the site of last year’s delightful, but incomplete, adventure. The walk in Capitol Reef was wonderful, again, and this time, I found the fork in the trail that led to Cassidy Arch. And here it is (in slightly washed out light).

Then came the campaign and the election, the staple of my schedule through the fall (with a side of weekly hikes). Starting in September, I spent several hours a couple of times each week working on the election—first doing voter registration, then shifting to door-to-door get-out-the-vote canvassing. I hated it. Every time I got out of my car, I had to talk to myself: "Just go do it, Janis. One door-knock at a time." I knew I had to do whatever I could, because if she lost / if he won, I didn't want to wonder if I should have done more.

The campaign and its outcome well warrant the remainder of Dickens’ words:

it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity,

it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness,

it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair

You know what the campaign was like. Belief in the ultimate power of the process to select someone qualified, at least somewhat, for this most important job … and incredulity as we watched his ignorance and boorishness be rewarded over and over. The season of Light emerged occasionally in the words of someone sane, brilliant, speaking from the depths—like Michelle Obama—but that Darkness was close behind, as even brilliance and poignancy were disregarded. The perpetual spring of hope, as the polls continued to show 90%+ probability that the nation would soon have its first woman president. And the winter of despair that settled in early in the evening of November 8, when even the (very partisan) commentators couldn’t tweak the results enough to make her victory look likely.

 we had everything before us, we had nothing before us …

And you know what happened on November 8. It’s what brought me back here. That was, without a doubt, among the worst of times. We had everything before us: the expectation for positive change ahead, the certainty that at least the outrageousness of the campaign would end on a sane note. And then nothing. Hopes dashed, confusion, anger, fear setting in. Nothing to feed the dreams we might have dared dream if she’d won.

On the other hand, that “nothing” did actually give us something: one of the biggest challenges of our lives (at least mine). I think about that arch I didn’t find last year, but reached this year. And the trail that I decided not to hike in a moment of clarity, but that I plan to walk next year. There’s a lesson here.

And that brings to mind a now decades-old story about a waterfall:

I was on a canoe trip with friends in the Boundary Waters between Minnesota and Canada, six of us, each pair paddling a two-woman-and-a-dog craft crossing lake after lake, portaging in between. We were pulling away from the shore onto one of the string of lakes we were traversing. Just around a bend in the shore from where we were putting in was a falls that flowed from this lake into the one below. As we pulled away from the shore, the current drawn by the falls took our canoe, and we knew we were headed for trouble. I was thinking to myself: This is it. I can just give up and go with this rushing water and see what happens … or I can put all my energy into it, and maybe we can get out of the flow. Without saying a thing, both of us started paddling harder than we ever imagined we could. Slowly, we started making headway, dragging the canoe out of the current and into the calm water of the lake, where we set out in just the direction we had planned.

Landfall that day and camp that night felt especially good. We picked wild blueberries the next morning right outside the tent.

I don’t think of that story too often, but it seems fitting now.

© Janis Bohan, 2010-2015. Use of this content is welcome with attribution and a link to the post. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Comment on this post: 

If you got this blog via email, go to the blog website by clicking on the title at the top of this particular post.
To comment once you're on the website, click on "No comments" (or "2 comments" etc.) below the blog. Comments from "anonymous" welcome.

Yogi Berra was right.

(If you received this blog by email, you might want to visit the actual site. The pictures work much better there. 

Just click on the title “Yogi Berra was right”)

Have you ever written a long email, took you hours (it seemed), only to lose it when you hit some mystery key that snatched it into oblivion? I did something like that yesterday with a blog post. As I was pulling it together, a formatting goblin possessed it and refused to be exorcised no matter which of my clever editing tricks I used. Finally, not enthusiastic about re-typing the whole thing from scratch (I’m a slow and rotten typist), I took it as a sign that I wasn’t supposed to post that particular blog. I was ambivalent about it anyhow. The fact that I’m obsessed with post-election activism, I kept thinking, doesn’t mean everyone wants to read my latest rant. At great length.

So I decided to do the Cliff Notes version of that blog, and pass along some fun photos as insulation. After all, it’s solstice, and we should celebrate the return of the light … while doing our part to be sure it returns (I couldn’t resist that little hint of the goblin-esque blog).

  

So here’s that blog post, in brief:

Yogi Berra was right. It ain’t over til it’s over.

We can’t let the complicated distraction of the holidays—or our activism fatigue from being hyper-energized by this stuff for over a month—persuade us that it’s time to kick back and wait for our next best shot at a different president. We have to be active, stay active, protest, resist, organize … do what JFK called “the quiet work of centuries,”* keep building toward what MLK called “the beloved community.” 

A bunch of articles in recent days have heightened my awareness of how truly, deeply, genuinely scary this time is for our communities and our country. Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman described the moment like this: “If there is any hope of redemption, it will have to begin with a clear recognition of how bad things are. American democracy is very much on the brink.” Michelle Obama said to Oprah, “Now we’re feeling what not having hope feels like.”

To me, those are heads up, wake-up calls to action. For hints of what got me all riled up, read these articles:

How Republics End 

Donald Trump, This is Not Normal! 

In Poland, a Window on What Happens when Populists Come to Power 

Dear America, Why Did You Let Us Down? 

So what should we do?  

“Shout from the rooftops,” despite the exhaustion that comes from sustaining outrage (Charles Blow, NYT).

Stand up, speak up, protest, write letters, make phone calls, write emails, sign petitions, lobby elected officials, demonstrate. And then do it all again. (Paraphrased from comments by the ED of the Colorado ACLU at a recent community forum).

And from author Ken Burns, asked by a student what she should do in the face of the threat posed by Trump:

What to do, you ask? A million things, of course. But it begins with the first step of awareness and commitment, which you have already made.

Just go forward. Engage. Don’t despair. Find likeminded people—not from your social circle, but everywhere. Change the opinions of others, not with ridicule, but reason.

Finally, remember too that Barack Obama himself has said that the highest office in the land is not president, but citizen.

Be one.

He was talking to me. Be a citizen, he said. Be a participant in this marvelous experiment in Democracy—or share the responsibility if it crashes.

And remember, some people don’t have the option of stepping back. People of color, religious minorities, immigrants, people with disabilities, veterans, LGBTQ (especially trans) people, women … all of the people that this president elect and his nascent administration have targeted or promised to target—they/we are members of our communities, too, and we/they can’t sit back and wait. The dangers are every day for them/us. Those of us with great privilege need to spend it now, spend it toward the beloved community.

If we’re in this for the long haul—and we are, like it or not—we have to look beyond the cartoon image of a mass of orange hair hovering above the inaugural bible. We have to stay engaged when the ceremonies are over and the daily grind sets in.

P.S.     If you’re looking for some ideas about just how to get active, stay tuned for a soon-to-be-announced (by Out Boulder County and A Queer Endeavor) “Community 100-Day Plan”—a people’s equivalent to the president’s “first 100-days” plan. I can just about promise that something there will get you jazzed.

--------------

* Aptly, the phrase “the quiet work of centuries” became the title of Resonance Women’s Chorus’ recent post-election concert.

© Janis Bohan, 2010-2015. Use of this content is welcome with attribution and a link to the post. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Comment on this post: 

If you got this blog via email, go to the blog website by clicking on the title at the top of this particular post.
To comment once you're on the website, click on "No comments" (or "2 comments" etc.) below the blog. Comments from "anonymous" welcome.

Psychic pruning

I promise that not every edition of this blog henceforth will be about the election and its residue, although I imagine that life (mine and others’) will be pretty intensely shaped by those things for a long time. Like the heightened awareness of oppression in all its manifestations that DT and his ilk have stirred. So, the other day, I had an experience that called my attention to one such manifestation: ageism. Not the sort directed by others at those of us who are old, but the internalized type, the (often unrecognized) ways in which ageism lives under the skin of all of us, including those of us who are its target, those of us who are old.

So here’s the story: I was walking along the bike path, near a pond where some daring (fool-hearty?) person and their dog had recently played on the very thin ice ...

(here’s a picture to spruce up the page) ... 

... when I saw two women walking together toward me. An older woman, maybe my age, had a dog on a leash and was walking slightly behind a younger, middle-aged woman. The older woman had a slight smile on her face, a smile that I saw as resigned, maybe even sad. The younger woman was saying something, but the words weren’t clear to me.

As I passed them, I almost instantly made up a story about them.

They are mother and daughter, and the mother is visiting from out of town. Their conversation is congenial, but a bit tense. Maybe the mom has said something that the daughter sees as mistaken—even ill informed or out of touch. They have such conversations pretty frequently, where the daughter is slightly dismissive, while the mom is eager to engage, eager to find a moment of positive connection. She tries hard to say and do things that will please her daughter so they can have a close relationship. She always hopes for that, though it keeps eluding her. She wants to go back to the warm intimacy of her relationship with her 8-year-old daughter, even her early-teenage daughter, before her child reached the age when she needed to push away, to find herself and her own life. Mom so looks forward to these visits, always imagining that something might light that spark again.

Now, the daughter is off into her own life, her own relationships, her own priorities. Leaving her mom behind … figuratively as well as literally. The daughter thinks mom is a bit of a pain. She still loves her mom—after all, it’s her mom! But their interests are just so different, and her mom seems so far outside this world, always wanting to talk about issues that don’t matter much and memories that don’t mean much to the daughter. She’s happy with her life, which is very full without squeezing mom into her schedule. She doesn’t long for the earlier days at all … in fact, she doesn’t remember much about her early years as a kid. Her first clear recollections of her mom are from adolescence, when her mother just didn’t “get it.” They didn’t fight really, but she chafed at how much her mom wanted to be in the middle of her life. She was glad to go away to college, and pretty much never looked back.

Mom, for her part, had looked forward to this trip with eager anticipation. She planned carefully what clothes she’d bring, imagined how happy she’d be to see her daughter and grandkids. She’d been counting the days. Now here she is, with this awkward little tension between them, displacing the shared joy she’d imagined.

OK, I elaborated my on-the-spot story a little. Not all of that went through my mind in the minutes right after I saw them. Some of it did. And then, as I reflected on this encounter and the instant story I’d spun about it, some was added based on previous experiences. Like seeing a woman (presumably a mom) greeted, or left to wait alone, at the airport, a half-hug her only connection with others. Or a mom at dinner with her adult offspring’s family, sitting silently, wearing her nicest outfit while her kid’s family stare at their cell phones, wearing jeans and sweatshirts. Some of the story comes from imagining my own mom’s experience and wondering whether my actions made her feel as I imagine these women might be feeling. So, in truth, virtually all of my story about that day is a snapshot of my own feeling about moms, especially my mom. And about what my life as an old woman will become over the years.

But the part of this encounter I want to focus on is this: There I was, walking along, crafting this sad tale in my mind, when I suddenly caught myself.

Wait a minute, Janis (I said). Why are you assuming that this woman is so passive, so at the mercy of her kids? Why aren’t you granting her some agency in her own life? Give her a break! Maybe her smile isn’t sad or resigned at all, but quietly contented. Maybe she loves these times with her daughter, enjoying watching this younger woman build a vibrant life—just what she would have wished for her child. Maybe her smile betrays her calm recognition that they’re different people, with different ideas … and the hope that soon, her daughter will be able to accept that, too. Heck, maybe she came simply because these visits are important to them both, even though she’ll be happy to get back home so she can get on with organizing teach-ins with her activist friends. Why am I so quick to make her powerless, abandoned, tragic?

I knew the answer at the same time I asked myself these questions. I was imagining her this way because I believe (if only non-consciously) that this is what old age means: abandonment, loneliness, emptiness, powerlessness—even though I may (consciously) insist that my friends and I are exceptions to this general rule. Ah, internalized ageism, that recurrent bugaboo.

I’ve written about this here before (and experienced it far more than I’ve written). It’s hard to shake this sense that aging is inevitably miserable when that’s how it’s so persistently portrayed, how we learned, throughout the many decades of our own lives, to see it. Why else would we feel offended if someone refers to us as "old"? I apparently learned that lesson well. My assumptions about these women, after all, are totally made up—I know nothing about them. Instead, they reveal my fears about myself and, increasingly, my own life: that I will be pitiful, pitiable. That I’ll be dependent on others' generosity, my happiness totally bound up in their attentiveness to me.

Like other forms of oppression—overt and internalized—this stuff requires constant, or at least repeated, attention. In a strange twist, I’m glad I had this internal story-writing experience, if only to catch myself doing it … again. To remind myself, again, how deeply rooted these ageist attitudes become over a long lifetime.

I often think that ageism is so very difficult to overcome—in our attitudes toward others and our feelings about our own worth—because each of us has such a short time to deal with it. We believe the lies until we’re at this stage in our own lives. Then, by the time we get here and find out that they’re lies, we’re already declared by others to be irrelevant because we’re old (and even worse, old women). We aren’t important enough for our insights to matter. Bad timing: we just barely “get it,” when we lose our credibility. And then we die, taking our newfound wisdom with us. Bummer.

Unless, that is, we refuse to let ageism (along with all the other “-isms” that have grown in our psychic gardens over the years) go unrecognized and unchallenged. And that requires, first of all, that we extract it, root and shoot, from our own psyches.

Now there’s a mental gardening task!

© Janis Bohan, 2010-2015. Use of this content is welcome with attribution and a link to the post. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Comment on this post: 

If you got this blog via email, go to the blog website by clicking on the title, "Psychic pruning," at the top of this particular post.
To comment once you're on the website, click on "No comments" (or "2 comments" etc.) below the blog. Comments from "anonymous" welcome.

Now it's 3 weeks ...

(If you received this blog by email, you might want to visit the actual site. The pictures work much better there. 

Just click on the title “Now it's 3 ...”)

Still bummed. Still struggling to find a way through the post election shock and toward some positive trajectory forward. Whatever “forward” means in this uncharted territory, where a billionaire reigns as the “people’s president-elect.” Where we have no idea what our future president will actually do about all the issues that lie ahead—national and international—or what he actually believes about just about anything. A landscape piled high with the toxic detritus of the pre-election campaign, with the post-election rise in hate crimes of all sorts. In a world where the Oxford English Dictionary just declared the word of the year to be “post-truth,” and where “fake news” guides the decision-making of voters—and, arguably, some winning politicians.

Yet, the uncertain future of our fellow humans, global politics, and the fragile environment notwithstanding, I continue to aspire to an active, engaged, determined, hopeful … maybe fantastic approach to the world we have, even though (or more accurately, precisely because) it threatens the world I wish we had. 

Maybe this is the place to mention that my soul seems not entirely settled from the upheaval of Nov. 8. This despite many miles walked (even—happily!—in the snow) ...

...  and a staycation in Denver, sleeping in, having coffee with the morning news, and going to movies … with a bit of work in the down times. The other morning, I woke up from a half dream, half conscious conversation with myself about a sudden clear awareness that there’s a limit to how much people can endure and remain sane. Maybe it came directly from the election, knowing that some people are literally fighting for their lives here. Maybe from trying to explain my own recent illness to a friend, when it seems to have so many roots. Maybe from hearing that an acquaintance recently had a “nervous breakdown” (whatever that means) from too much life stress.  Or maybe, I speculated at the time, because much as I would like to rise phoenix-like from my post-election crash, the whole situation still feels pretty much too awful to consider.

Still, being active is all we have, if we’re to (a) stay sane ourselves and (b) make some kind of difference in this totally unacceptable, insane circumstance. So, onward! 

A friend recently asked me to share what I was doing in the way of being active, so I thought I’d mention a few things I’ve been doing to stay sane during the past couple of weeks. In my last blog, I told you about picking up dog poop in the bike path (a major step at the time), upping my contributions to some orgs I believe in, and trying to understand the folks who supported Trump (at least some of them) instead of villianizing them. Well now, I’ve graduated to actually entering the social and cultural world, breaking (slightly) out of my post-election isolation.  This daring escape into shared reality (broadly construed) has included seeing some thought-provoking movies (“Moonlight,” with race and sexual orientation intertwined; “Loving,” a 50-year-old story for these so-called modern times; and “Arrival,” which says far more about openness to communication than about aliens); a visit to the Universe Canticle, a massive hand-sewn work depicting the origin and evolution of the universe (including the current threat of climate change) crafted by women from rural South Africa whose lives are affected by HIV/AIDS; volunteering to review a nascent website for Community Food Share, an activity that could easily lead to more vol work there; and joining in a group project to send letters to President Obama in support of the water protectors at Standing Rock. None of these was huge, but together, they help dissipate that ominous feeling of powerlessness.

Upcoming community events where I plan to participate include Tuesday’s community gathering, “Moving Toward Collective Liberation,” and a Friends-sponsored movie/discussion about relationships between the dominant culture and indigenous peoples. Again, nothing huge, but all snowflakes in the avalanche. For the longer haul, I’m working with my partner and folks from Out Boulder, A Queer Endeavor, and other local orgs to create a “People’s Inaugural,” where individuals and groups will launch their personal/collective “First 100 Days” programs. The idea, borrowed (with permission) from a friend of a friend of my partner, is to mirror presidents’ promises for their "first 100 days"—typically a very ambitious package of goals which, if met, would move their agenda along toward their imagined "legacy."

In this case, folks will be invited to create—individually or in groups—their own "first 100-day plan" to begin on inauguration day, Jan. 20, 2017. Ultimately, all of these 100-day plans combined will collectively move us toward our ultimate aim of leaving a "people's legacy" of actions that protect existing human rights and move us toward greater equality, that protect the environment, and that support peace in the world.

An immodest goal, I know. But isn’t it an awesome image, really? Lots of people, each taking responsibility for making positive change in their own world, as we collectively launch our parallel agenda to whatever happens in Washington and Trump Tower.

Awesome enough to ease me into a restful night’s sleep with no rough awakening to angst and dread.

© Janis Bohan, 2010-2015. Use of this content is welcome with attribution and a link to the post. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Comment on this post: 

If you got this blog via email, go to the blog website by clicking on the title at the top of this particular post.

To comment once you're on the website, click on "No comments" (or "2 comments" etc.) below the blog. Comments from "anonymous" welcome.

Ooof. The electoral apocalypse, a week later

(If you received this blog by email, you might want to visit the actual site. The pictures work much better there. 

Just click on the title “Ooof ….”)

So, I’ve been missing from the blogosphere for a long time. Sometime, I may try to pull my thoughts together to explain why. But not today, one week after Hillary Clinton gave her concession speech. A week and a day after Donald Trump became the official president elect. Today, I have to talk about that event, because it pretty much dominates what I’m thinking and feeling as I go through these days. I don’t presume that I have anything novel and newsworthy to say here. Lots of people who are lots smarter and more informed than I have already written volumes. But I’m hoping that writing about this experience will clarify it for me … and maybe speak to someone else as well. Maybe I’ll throw in some pictures, just to break up the ocean of text. Visual notes from a sunnier summer.

OK, how to begin describing the plunge in hope and mood that started last Tuesday evening – an experience I know I shared with many – and my efforts to crawl back to the surface? Background: I worked a lot on the Dem campaign because I knew I had to do something. Otherwise, if Hillary lost, I’d feel awful, knowing I hadn’t done whatever I could. So I started in early September, registering voters. Then in November, I moved on to canvassing, going door to door and encouraging people to vote … preferably to vote Democratic. Let me just mention that this activity is my second-least-favorite pastime in the world, surpassed in its awfulness only by phone banking. I’ve done lots of both over the years, and I hate it. But out I went, into local neighborhoods, clipboard in hand, knocking on doors and checking folks off my list. Each time I got out of my car, I’d take a deep breath and tell myself, “Just do this, Janis. Just do it.” Then I’d put on my friendly face and start knocking on strangers’ doors. I was glad I was doing it.

Then election day, at last. I worked all day, coming and going from the campaign office with a new list every few hours. The mood there was so up-beat, so casually confident, I caught the easy optimism, and left there late in the day, looking forward to going home and cheering as the results came in. You all know what happened next.

I went to bed late, slept poorly, and awoke feeling like I had a sandbag on my chest. I recognized the raw feeling that comes when you realize that a terrible thing happened yesterday, and it’s still there. It wasn’t a dream. I spent hours buried in news stories, hoping for a glimmer of hope, disbelieving what I read. Some moments, I felt angry – at Trump’s very existence, at the people who voted for him, at the media, at the Democratic party, at Hillary … looking for someone to blame. Sometimes, I felt deeply fearful, a bit for myself, but mostly for the very vulnerable people that Trump so actively, egregiously targeted during the campaign. Mostly, I felt depressed. Heavy of heart, unable to move from my computer chair, not interested in … anything. I was hugely relieved when my partner quietly said to me, “It’s not depression. It’s grief.”

            

Grief, I thought. I might be able to manage grief. Struggle through it rather than sink beneath it. I know some ways to keep grief from becoming full-fledged depression. Like getting active, physically and in other constructive ways. The first thing I did was go for a long walk. And on that walk, I began to sketch some thoughts for surviving the coming days of this to-my-core sadness and for getting active as it lifted.

My first thoughts focused, not surprisingly, on this question of grief. I asked myself what I was grieving for, what had I lost? Well, for starters, the possibility of a continuation of relatively progressive politics in this country. The possibility of shifting the Supreme Court toward a more positive stance over the next several decades. The chance to see a woman as president, which would be a remarkable experience, given that I personally remember being unable to get a credit card or a bank account in my own name. But more: I had lost my country. Or, more accurately, my fantasy / beliefs / assumptions about my country. I knew that there were lots of folks who disagree with me on many levels. But  I did not know that there were so many of us who could endorse this man, whose unself-conscious bigotry, ignorance, and meanness you all know too well. And now, I realized that I had just lost that imagined country.

(By the way, none of this was as rational and linear as my description. I cried as I walked, felt simultaneously too alone and very glad for time alone, simultaneously strong and off balance, generally disoriented. And I noticed that I wasn’t noticing my walk – which is unusual for me.)

                   

The walk helped, but that heavy, hopeless feeling was still there. I had to figure out what I could actually do about this state of affairs – my own internal state, and the state of the nation (heck, the world!)  I’m really lucky here, because I know there's a ton of psychological thought and research on how to survive these miserable moments, much of it done by my partner. Years of osmosis have paid off, so I had lots of these ideas at my mental fingertips. For those who aren’t quite that lucky, she just wrote a column for Out Boulder, so you too can have access to this wisdom. If you read it, you’ll spot the influence of these ideas in virtually every step of my own process.

So, following my Wednesday morning walk, I knew that my first step had to be learning  to understand the people who had voted for Trump – not just as bigots, but as people with real needs that they imagined Trump’s presidency could meet. I knew this would be a stretch for me. I was feeling far too fragile to start reading hateful diatribes against Hillary or “big government,” too angry to hear how inspiring Trump is or how he’s the perfect person to save his “fans” from The Machine. But I really did want to understand his supporters, what their lives are like. I needed to do this to interrupt my tendency to demonize and stereotype them. That path gave him too much power over my well-being,  and me too little.

My partner and I began a concerted effort to locate and read information about Trump voters. This turned out not to be too hard, once I got outside the “echo chamber” of people as demoralized and outraged as I. I soon located  a series of articles that addressed just this aim (you can find some of them here, here, here, and here). 

Gradually, I/we began to see and talk about these people in a new light. Not just as white men (mostly) who resented the progress of women and people of color over recent decades, who were suffering from “privilege deprivation.” But as people who have been … are being … genuinely ignored, dismissed, trivialized, discounted, and taken for granted by governmental systems that purport to support them. People who feel isolated from urban centers of power and privilege, and who want their governments, local and national, to “see” them and reflect them. Some folks have described the loss of dignity that people in this situation might well feel. In this vein, I was so struck by a comment made by Arthur Brooks in an exchange with Gail Collins (both of the NY Times): “A few years ago,” Brooks reflected, “I was having lunch with [the president of a progressive think tank]. I asked her to given me a simplest explanation for why some people who never prospered over the past few years nonetheless loved President Obama so much. She said, ‘He gives them dignity.’ I thought that was very profound, and I think that’s a big part of what’s going on today as well with Trump,” he finished. Maybe that was what Trump's supporters heard beneath his hyperbole: a promise of simple dignity.

I could  say much more, but I’ll let this sketch suffice for now. If you’re interested, you’ll find more discussion at the bottom of this blog entry, or you can read more about it in the articles linked above.  

So, with a tenuous handle on my fear, rage, and disbelief, the next step was to manage my sadness and sense of powerlessness. I needed to get myself active. The physical part was pretty simple I happily slid into my now-regular pattern of daily activity. Beyond that, I needed to be politically and socially active. Buoyed by the hope of coming out of this a better human being, I imagined great leaps into activism, sailing forth on a wave of indignation and inspiration. But I knew I’d have to start slowly. Really slowly, as it turned out. Those first days, I managed to write checks to some orgs that I really respect. I considered where I might volunteer down the road. I pondered a lot and read some. I talked to myself and with friends. But actually acting, as opposed to considering acting, was harder.

My first tiny step came while I was walking home from the gym on Friday, three days after the election, I encountered a pile of dog poop left by a pooch whose human hadn’t bothered to pick it up. I added a detour to my walk to fetch a plastic bag, returned to the scene of the drop, picked up the offending pile, and carried it to the nearest trash can. A small act, but it seemed important. I felt like I had made a gesture toward the universe, saying I can make a difference, a change for the better in my world.

The next day, I passed a woman on the bike path whose dog was keeping a careful eye on me as I approached from the rear. I greeted them both and then said, “It’s nice to have someone watching your back right now. The world is more dangerous for a lot of people since the election.” I realized I had just made a mini-ally statement, calling to her attention the reality that for some people, the potential for real danger is greater this week than last. Another tiny step toward showing up.

Then on Monday, my partner and I met with some other folks to help plan an upcoming event related to the election’s outcome, and I agreed to help organize an event in January – although the last time I organized an event, I swore I’d never do it again. More steps. Today, I went to Denver for a rally in support of immigrant families. Small steps. But slowly, I feel more present to life as I go through my days,

This is not to say that it's been a steady path forward. During the past week, I've had moments of progress and enthusiasm, and moments of descent back into deep sorrow. I’ve felt empowered (picking up poop), and I’ve had tears come to my eyes for no apparent reason (stretching in an aerobics class). In the low times, I’ve tried to call up the advice offered in the aforementioned Out Boulder article: to pause and think of what I value, what’s important in my life. It helps me get away from the obsessive focus on what’s wrong and back to what I want to create from this. In those moments of reflection, I’ve realized that writing this blog has been something I’ve valued, for a whole host of reasons. As of today, I’m planning to resume blogging, as time permits. I’ll be good for me, I know. It always was. I’ll try to catch up with some blog-worthy stories from the past year – or at minimum, some pictures. I’ve passed up on so many opportunities. Anyway, here I am, writing a blog. Whether or not anyone reads it, writing this particular post has helped me pull together a week’s worth of struggling to dig out from the sticky post-election morass I sank into Tuesday night. It’s another step.

…

Now it’s Thursday morning, and Nicholas Kristof, a NYT op-ed writer whom I love, has weighed in with a column that summarizes beautifully much of what I hope to take from this week (I told my partner he’s channeling her work). For an added boost in your own process, read it here.

...

Now it's Friday morning, a week after the dog poop incident. There's snow on the ground, and a sunny day ahead. I'll be taking a long walk with a friend's dog, a fun companion for me. And I'll be telling her all about it, sorting it out some more. And waiting to see what happens next, where I need to show up.

-----------------------

Post  Script:

If you’re interested, here’s more about what I’ve come to understand about the people who voted for Trump.

Many of the people who voted for Trump – especially those in rural areas and the Midwestern “rust belt” (who have historically been reliable supporters of Dem candidates) – are people who work dawn to dusk at back-breaking labor, playing by the supposed rules, who are still unable to make ends meet. Their parents did the same work and were able to get ahead, leaving more to their kids than they had – but now those kids find themselves stuck, with no hope for getting ahead.

They see highly educated people who live in big cities with tons of resources and opportunities – schools, museums, culture, support services, government offices – who are far wealthier than they are, although those urbanites don’t appear to work anywhere near as hard. They see the seats of power located, always, in these cities, readily accessible to city dwellers as sources of information, services, and high-paying jobs. They read about people of color and other minority populations, mostly clustered in cities – unfamiliar to folks living in rural areas, and therefore easily stereotyped and misunderstood, even vilified. They hear about government programs like affirmative action, that (in their understanding – but how would they know otherwise?) – assure jobs for these folks who look nothing like the people they know, whether or not they’re deserving. They see officials of all stripes who never ask them about their lives. Who never visit their homes, never work beside them, never talk to them. Politicians who drop by during the campaign, visit the state fair and eat a corndog, maybe have coffee with locals at the diner, and call that “connecting” with their rural constituencies.

Add to this the implicit biases we all learn just by growing up in this culture and absorbing its mores: racism, sexism, and abelism; xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and Islamophobia; homo-, bi-, and transphobia. We all learned them. But some of us have had opportunities to unlearn them, or at least to temper them. Those opportunities are available almost entirely in cities; anti-racism intensives would be hard to find in rural mid-America. So those of us who have had those learning opportunities condemn those who have not, labeling them bigots – when what really separates us from them is our (often unrecognized) privilege.

Why wouldn’t these people believe that the deck is stacked against them? Why wouldn’t they think that city dwellers – even “foreigners” in the cities – have a better shot at the American dream than they have? Why wouldn’t they believe that they system has left them behind and left them out?

All it takes, then, is for someone to tell them just that: the system is rigged against you. Of course, they shout, Yes! Finally, someone has seen us! Has recognized our distress!

To fire up the enthusiasm even more, that person need only violate all the norms of “polite” (or “politically correct”) conversation – ill-defined norms that are foreign to their lives – by saying the things that they dare not say, have been condemned for saying. We’ve created, in the words of political scientist Katherine Cramer, a politics of resentment. And resentment is a mighty motivator.

In a sense, this isn’t even about Trump himself. It could have been anyone who poked the right tender spots, who saw the distress and resentment of these people and named it, pulled for it, capitalized on it. Who made them feel visible, important, central – and named the system that had previously left them feeling the opposite: their own government. The added energy evoked by allowing them – in fact, encouraging them – to think, to say, and to do the things that are forbidden by “polite” society energized a movement that made them feel powerful, like they could change the system.

It just required someone who seemed not beholden to the system (at least in the usual ways), someone who was willing to thumb his nose, flip the bird at the system. Someone to tell these abandoned Americans that they, like he, are the real Americans.

Deal sealed. No need for millions of demons. Just ordinary people, rendered invisible by the powers that be, plus a rank narcissist willing to use their distress for his own aggrandizement.

Oops. I guess I’m not totally done villianizing yet. Like I said, it’s a slow process …

© Janis Bohan, 2010-2015. Use of this content is welcome with attribution and a link to the post. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Comment on this post: 

If you got this blog via email, go to the blog website by clicking on the title at the top of this particular post.

To comment once you're on the website, click on "No comments" (or "2 comments" etc.) below the blog. Comments from "anonymous" welcome.